Well, here we go. Will the REAL Barack Hussein Obama please rise. This is really upsetting, because I was trying to work out some details on my book when I got this news, and I just HAD to immediately drop everything and start typing. This is a disgrace and a sacrilege. I guess I can at least give the man credit for coming out with his homosexual agenda BEFORE winning the nomination.

A couple of weeks ago, as you may recall, I wrote an article called “Who Wants to Homosexualize a Seven Year Old?” Here is a quote from my article: “Who in the world could be in favor of reading a book to second graders about a prince who, instead of marrying a princess, decides to marry her BROTHER. That’s right…her BROTHER! Talk about a “fairy” tale…or should I say “fairy tail?” The book is called “King and King.”

While Barack Hussein Obama declined to comment on that, he had plenty to say yesterday in an open letter to the LGBT community. By the way, that’s lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender.

He speaks of running for president to assure the founding fathers’ promise of “equality for all” extends to “our gay brothers and sisters.” Well, I have news for him, If our “fathers” were gay, we wouldn’t be here. It is not a natural state of existence, and it is an abomination before God.

Two things bring me to this conclusion: a) the Holy Bible says it is a sin; b) if same-sex sex were natural, it would result in procreation, just like straight sex.

In his letter, Barack Hussein Obama says, “It’s wrong to have millions of Americans living as second-class citizens in this nation. And I ask for your support in this election so that together we can bring about real change for all LGBT Americans.”

So now we’re getting to the route cause for this “open letter.” He wants to garner the LGBT community vote. I don’t blame him for that, there do seem to be quite a few of them running around, and I certainly feel that, as Americans, they have as much of a right to vote as anyone else. Just one question, though: Does a Bisexual vote count as one or two? I’ll bet at the DNC, Obama will try to get two votes counted for every bisexual.

His letter goes on to say that, “I co-sponsored a fully inclusive bill that prohibited discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, extending
protection to the workplace, housing, and places of public accommodation.” So, basically, if there is a man who feels he is trapped in a woman’s body, Barack Hussein Obama wants him to be able to coach your little girl’s softball team, and then be able to use the same restroom as your daughter and wife. Isn’t that special!

Next, he says, “And as president, I will place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.”

I personally don’t believe in special protection for ANY group where crime is concerned. Why should a gay man getting beat up be more severe under the law than me getting beat up? As I always say, a crime is a crime. And as far as outlawing workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity…forget that!

As I mentioned, I don’t want some “genderly-confused” man teaching my little girl Phys Ed. It’s just insane, and I pray to God above the American people won’t stand for it.

So, if Barack Hussein Obama has his way, we will have male teachers running around the school halls in dresses. Talk about “real change.” Sounds like Obama wants to “really change” your son into a girl! What is this crap?

Later in this fairytale letter of his, he says he wants to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This is the act that allows an exception of the full faith and credit clause in the Constitution forcing one state to honor the laws of another. If two men get married in Mass., where that kind of thing is legal, without DOMA, Kentucky, where that kind of thing is illegal, would have to recognize the two men as a married couple. PURE INSANITY!

Also, while we are in the middle of a two-pronged war, and a protracted War on Terror, Barack Hussein Obama wants to repeal the “Don’t ask don’t tell” military policy. Someone needs to tell the man, “If it ain’t broke, don’t mess with it!”

He then goes on to talk about HIV/AIDS, a very serious subject. Apparently, he is for age-appropriate abstinence education (you could have knocked me over with a feather when I read that), but then he dropped the bomb. Free, clean needle exchanges for junkies, and condom distribution in prisons.

Next he says, “I will never compromise on my commitment to equal rights for all LGBT Americans. But neither will I close my ears to the voices of those who still need to be convinced.” Not the voices of those who have strong convictions otherwise, but those who “still need to be convinced.”

What an arrogant, pompous ass. I am telling you that if this guy is our next president, America will cease to exist within the next twenty years. People, this is a dangerous man. He wants to strip our boys of their manhood. By the time he is done, every male under the age of thirty will be ashamed of being a heterosexual man.

I know I am ranting now, but this just really ate my lunch. Running on a platform of letting male teachers wear dresses to elementary classes because they are women trapped in a man’s body. Give me a BREAK!

Barack Hussein Obama is trying to be all things to all people…and they’re buying it! They love this guy. Is it possible that Barack Hussein Obama is actually the fore-runner to the anti-Christ? All indications are pointing that way.

During our last discussion on Senator McCain, we talked about his stances on civil rights…most of which I liked. Looking again to ontheissues.org, as I feel they have comprehensive summaries of where the remaining candidates stand on important issues, our first topic today is corporations.

Q: The president's economic stimulus plan would send out 116 million checks to American homes, but without permanent tax cuts that you sought. Will you vote for this compromise?

A: Yes, I will and I'm disappointed, because I think it's very important that we make the Bush tax cuts permanent. I voted to make them permanent twice already. If people and businesses and families in America are now planning their 2010 budget, there's a great deal of uncertainty. And if we don't make the tax cuts permanent, then they will experience what amounts to a tax increase. But I also would make sure that not only the tax cuts are made permanent, but we cut corporate income taxes. That would keep businesses here, and it would keep jobs here and create jobs here. We pay the highest corporate income tax of any nation in the world except for Japan. I'm glad to see that we're going to allow people to expense new investments in equipment, so they can write them off in a very short period of time.
Source: 2008 GOP debate in Boca Raton Florida Jan 24, 2008

M.R.O. says: We most definitely need for those tax cuts to be permanent. The hard workers here in America deserve to keep MORE of their pay, not less. There are so many wasteful government programs that could be cut out that we could probably run another country just off those savings.

And I am glad to see the lesson of Reagan’s “trickle-down economics” was not lost on Mr. McCain. It should be obvious to anyone who’s not a liberal (or anyone with common sense), that if you save the job-providers money, they will be more likely, and more able, to provide more jobs. Way to go, John!

People worry about corporations unduly influencing elections

Most Americans understand that competitive elections in a free country require money. Since campaigns require spending funds to communicate with voters, they know we can never take money completely out of politics, nor should we. Americans have a right to support the candidates and the parties they endorse, including financially if they so choose.

But what most Americans worry about profoundly is corporations or individuals with huge checks seeking the undue influence on lawmakers that such largesse is intended to purchase. That is why John McCain has fought to enforce long-standing prohibitions on corporate and union contributions to federal political parties, for sensible donation limits, disclosure of how candidates and campaigns are funded, and the diligent enforcement of these common sense rules that promote maximum public participation in the political process and limit opportunities for corruption.
Source: Campaign website, www.johnmccain.com, "Issues" Sep 1, 2007

M.R.O. says: Certainly, worded this way, these types of campaign limits make sense. Certainly we don’t want huge oil companies greasing, or “oiling” if you will, the hands of our top decision-makers of new fuel technologies. I think, without pointing fingers, that has gone on long enough.

I still, however, am not happy about the limits on free speech that McCain-Feingold imposed. But I do think that full-disclosure of donors over a certain amount is a good way to try and rein-in influence peddling.

Voted NO on repealing tax subsidy for companies which move US jobs offshore.
Amendment to repeal the tax subsidy for certain domestic companies which move manufacturing operations and American jobs offshore.
Reference: Tax Subsidy for Domestic Companies Amendment; Bill S AMDT 210 to S Con Res 18 ; vote number 2005-63 on Mar 17, 2005

M.R.O. says: I disagree with this vote. I think if a company wants to move its operations to another country for cheaper labor, etc., they should lose some of the tax advantages for operating here and employing American workers.

Voted YES on reforming bankruptcy to include means-testing & restrictions

Amends Federal bankruptcy law to revamp guidelines governing dismissal or conversion of a Chapter 7 liquidation (complete relief in bankruptcy) to one under either Chapter 11 (Reorganization) or Chapter 13 (Adjustment of Debts of an Individual with Regular Income). Voting YES would:
-Declare a debtor eligible only for Chapter 13, as anyone financially capable of paying back their creditors at a rate that still allows them to earn above their state's median income
-Place domestic support obligations such as child support and alimony amongst the first priority claim category of non-dischargeable debts on a debtor filing for bankruptcy
-Require debtors to pay for and attend credit counseling prior to filing for bankruptcy
-Cap home equity protection at $125,000 if the debtor purchased a house within 40 months of filing for bankruptcy.

M.R.O. has no problem with voting yes on all of this. The bankruptcy laws have, for far too long, made it too easy to live beyond one’s means, say “oops,” screw your creditors, and give you a new life.

I especially like the fact that the reform places “domestic support obligations such as child support and alimony amongst the first priority claim category of non-dischargeable debts.” We have enough deadbeat dad’s and mom’s leaving their kids high-and-dry.

Tomorrow, or maybe later today if I have time, we will see where McCain stands on crime.

Until then-

My first book, "Mr. Right Opinion: Unplugged and Unashamed" will be available at Authorhouse.com. Just do an author search for your's truly, Michael A. Minton, and you can find it.

However, we still haven't gotten a cover design or cost ready yet. That will be coming soon. But, you can still go there and get a little flavor for the book.

Thanks,
Mike Minton

The Patriot Post
Founders' Quote Daily

"Whilst the last members were signing it Doctr. Franklin looking
towards the Presidents chair, at the back of which a rising
sun happened to be painted, observed to a few members near him,
that Painters had found it difficult to distinguish in their art
a rising from a setting sun. "

-- James Madison (Farrand's Records of the Federal Convention of
1787, 17 September 1787)

--------

Founders' Quote Daily is a service of The Patriot Post, the most widely
read conservative journal on the Internet. If you would like to receive
Founders Quote Daily, and this highly acclaimed Digest of news, policy and
opinion delivered FREE by e-mail to your inbox, link to:
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/

It's official: I signed a contract Monday to publish my completed book. It is tentatively called 'Mr. Right Opinion: Unplugged & Unashamed-one man's musings during perilous times in American history"

For now, it is set to be released in early August. I'll keep everybody posted with updates as the release nears.

I will say this much...I don't think I've ever been this excited in my life. Well, without getting a little bundle of joy out of it!!

God Bless,
Mike